Freezone Auditors

Admin Scale Counseling

During the 2009 FreeZone conference I gave a talk on delivering the Admin Scale. Here is a link to the video footage:

http://www.youtube.com/user/kenDaaron#grid/user/8DF4EEE5F81B4E8C

My Story

Glenn Samuels:
This is a brief story of my Scientology history.  I am currently counseling and am open to talk to anyone who wants help recovering from Scientology abuses.  I would like to commend you for leaving the Scientology Church.  It takes courage to leave and take an independent stand against a vengeful and unrelenting force.  I’m happy to see that there is a new independent movement.

I left the Church of Scientology in May, 1982 after being held under guard. Two former COs of the CMO were also under guard at the same time, we would wink at each other as we passed in the hallway.  I got my car keys from the not so bright guard and took off.
I left behind all my belongings, my wife, my sister, all my friends, my group and my dream of a safe and sane planet.  Most of you who are reading this know what I am talking about.  It is a rough and courageous thing to do and I admire you for doing it.

In the early 80s it was important to Miscavige and the Broekers to get rid of anyone who had his own voice in Scientology.  The people who built Scn. up from tiny orgs run in some major cities in old homes in bad neighborhoods and ugly industrial buildings to having admirable structures in all the major cities in the world were selectively and systematically expelled.  Top International Scientology Execs and Senior Messengers were kicked out or sent to “Happy Valley” where most of them were made to run around a tree for months, do menial work, and then got declared.  On the tech side almost everyone who trained directly under LRH was targeted as well.  It was important to the three in-charge to have no voice within the organization more popular, senior or convincing than their own.  Also it was important for no one to have more power or knowledge in any area, such as the tech.
R’s order was for Scientology to become a juggernaut, something that would run on its own after his death.  The way that order was implemented was callously brutal with human rights violations.  I left because of the human rights violations.  I was on a CMO Mission that ordered people thrown out on the street in Clearwater.  These people were my friends, good, sincere and hard working Sea Org members, not deserving of any of that nor being labeled “Suppressive Person.”  It is a subject of debate because of the strangle hold that Miscavige and the Broekers had over the communications in and out to R what he knew or didn’t know at that time.  But I know for a fact that LRH loved some of these people that were rounded up and cast aside.  Miscavige wrestled control of Scientology from the Broekers and you have what is going on now. 

When a leader of a religion is unbalanced and receives lawsuits or a court summons, they tend to blame and purge anyone near them. The whimsy and commonness with which someone is called an SP these days is staggering.  An SP is a very specific type person, they are not very common.  Most of the top execs and auditors were Clear.  By definition can a Clear be an SP?  It is an important question to consider to anyone in or out of Scientology. 

Auditing is not centered and focused on the person, but now exists for ulterior motives and sundry purposes. There should be no reason to keep them at Clearwater with endless unnecessary rundowns or intensives of sec checking to be sure, nor did OT 7 cans cost $380.00! And the staff abuses are vulgar and cruel.

In the 80s there was an independent movement which eventually failed due to harassment, endless litigation, and multi-million dollar pay offs from the church.  However, Sarge Gerbode did stand up to the church successfully, but it cost him a lot of money.  He developed what he calls TIR, traumatic incident reduction.  He went toe to toe with Miscavige and won the right to deliver parts of the tech in the name of his new organization.  He has done good work and has associations around the world, some funded by counties to help the abused.  It is good to see that.  And also I am glad that there is a new desire for people to get helped where it is all about the help and not about anything else. 

My focus is to help those families and Scientologist abused by cults. If anyone wishes to contact me and discuss getting getting helped I can be reached at glennsamuels-gmail.
I travel world wide.
(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).  I will travel world wide to help others.

Good luck,

Glenn

Midwest Tech Center, USA

A place to get audited Standardly, learn how to audit, get your auditing or training cleaned up. Tech and Admin Training, CSing, Word Clearing, Study Technology, Repair of Past Auditing, and Bridge Auditing are all available to Freezoners and new people. We are open to brand new people as well as seaoned veterans of Scientology. Not available to RTC or OSA, they have their own terminals to go to. They are not our enemy, but we feel they have lost the correct path. We wish them well. We reserve the right to accept those we train and audit.

Pierre Ethier gave a talk

While up in Scotland recently I had the pleasure of meeting Pierre Ethier. As good luck would have it he was giving a lecture about his experiences with scientology, the freezone (free zone, )the church, and many other things.

Enjoy!

David mayo talk on disillusionment

Here is a great talk by David Mayo on disillusionment:

Understanding How to Apply the Technology of Scientology

This is perhaps an oversimplification, but it gives a starting point
to new auditors who are only clued into whatever they have studied so
far. That may be books or some basic auditing courses.

Elementary, my dear Watson

Essentially there are two types of cases, easy cases and resistive
cases.

Easy cases, needless to say, are easy to handle. It won’t really
matter on an easy case, which of the many bridges* you decide to
apply. If they get the Grades first, that will be fine. If they get
Dianetics first, that will be fine. The easy case makes gains, and
they continue up any given bridge with the greatest of ease. Your
only job is to keep them moving on whichever bridge you choose, and
to audit with the Auditor’s Code in.

Resistive cases take special handling. Remember it is the case that
resists, not the preclear. And it is not that difficult, because
there are a limited number of subjects that can bring about a
resistive case. Most of those are on a “special cases” list, with
instructions on how to handle. You do need to be a Class III* auditor
and a NED auditor to handle the special cases assessment list.

The other things that can make a resistive case are missing grades.
It is difficult to handle a case, for example, who can’t talk to
you.

Determining—Easy Case or Resistive Case?

If you are new to auditing others, you certainly want to start with
an easy case! You will get wins and your pc will flourish. If you
must start with a resistive-type case, then make sure you are a Class
III auditor and have a Class VIII case supervisor.

With that advice now stated, an easy case can run engrams.* Assuming
the person knows what the word “engram” is you can have the pc close
his eyes, and, first book style, tell him that when you snap your
fingers the file clerk* will present the engram necessary to resolve
the case…SNAP…ok, what year is it? SNAP…and move the somatic strip*
through the incident until it erases, or run earlier similar engram
if necessary.

After a few passes through the pc is smiling and happy and tells you
what he has discovered, and how that changes his life! Easy case!

Compare this to a pc who has an engram, and you run it through time
and again, there is no earlier incident, there is no earlier
beginning to the incident, and ninety five times through and the pc
hasn’t moved on the tone scale. That is hasn’t hit low emotional
points, then higher emotional points…pc is still interested—just
nothing happening. Resistive case. Solution: Turn this case over
to a Class VIII c/s for repair and he/she will program to handle the
resistiveness.

Other Ways to Recognize a Resistive Case

I repeat, it is not the pc’s fault that he has a resistive case. It
takes a lot of patience and skilled auditing to handle such a case.
Get yourself trained as a Class III and NED auditor.

You can sometimes recognize when you have a case that would resist
just by knowing a bit of the pre-clear’s history. Most common, did
he take drugs? Drugs make a resistive case, especially street
drugs. There is a program called the Purification Rundown, followed
by objective process (outward processes, like “Look at that wall” as
compared to subjective processes like “recall a time you saw a wall”)
followed by what is called the “Drug Rundown.” A NED auditor can
give a Drug Rundown.

So you ask your potential preclear “Did you take street drugs?” If
yes, chances are his case will start resisting as you try to audit
it, if you audit it on anything else but drug engrams. As a new
auditor, you don’t want to set yourself up for failures and then
believe that the tech doesn’t work. The tech always works, but you
have to use the correct tech for the correct type of case.

It isn’t that much different from fixing a car—do you need a
screwdriver, or a hoist to lift the engine out? Use the correct tool
for the right problem area. A Case Supervisor gets the data so that
he/she can determine the right problem area so the correct process
(tool) can be used.

What Can a New Auditor Do?

The safest route for you as a new auditor and your preclear to take
is to work with a book such as Self Analysis. Both the auditor and
the pc read the book, especially the part that describes what you
will be doing. It starts with “List One”. Chances are if your
preclear runs well on Self Analysis he/she is an easy case.

What is running well? Pc is interested in at least most of the
questions, finds incidents easily, likes to share the experience with
the auditor, brightens up from time to time. Likes the auditing and
wants to do more.

Another book to use when working with a new preclear is Handbook for
Preclears. Both the auditor and preclear should read the book before
doing any of the questions or commands, so there is an agreement on
what they are doing. Handbook for Preclears is a very powerful book
and anyone who can do what the books says to do is certainly an “easy
case.”

These books take some of the charge off the case, and can make
running Dianetics, the Modern Science of Mental Health a lot easier
to do.

-30-

Glossary

Bridge: Short for “Classification and Gradation Chart.” There are
two sides to the bridge, one for auditors in training, and one side
for the preclear so he can move into higher states of being step-by-
step.

Class III: A Class 0 is a beginning auditor; a Class III has learned
how to do many things a Class 0 isn’t trained to do. Class VIII is
an auditor who is very highly trained.

Engram: An incident of pain and/or unconsciousness, that contains
impact or injury. It often contains command value, such as “stay
right here” which keeps the preclear in the incident, or “get out of
here” which bounces the preclear out of the engram.

File Clerk: Term used in Dianetics, the Modern Science of Mental
Health to help the new auditor handle the mind of the preclear.

Somatic Strip: Term used in Dianetics, the Modern Science of Mental
Health to help the new auditor handle the mind of the preclear.

non-confidential briefing on the bridges

Rey Robles kindly give us a talk on the verious bridge versions over the years. He also talks about some of the technical degrades that have permeated the bridge versions. Rey kindly gave a talk when he was last here in WA. He brings up many important points, lots of food for thought.